By Mariana Castillo, White House Chief Correspondent, WinsterFacts
The Facts
- On September 25, 2025, a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia indicted former FBI Director James Comey on two counts: making false statements to Congress and obstruction of a congressional proceeding. (Reuters)
- The indictment centers on Comey’s September 2020 testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, where he denied authorizing or being aware of FBI leaks to the media. Prosecutors argue the evidence contradicts that denial. (Reuters)
- A third charge (another false-statement count) was presented to the grand jury but rejected. (Just Security)
- The indictment followed the replacement of the previous U.S. Attorney with Lindsey Halligan, a Trump-aligned lawyer who personally signed the charges. (The Guardian)
- President Trump celebrated the indictment, calling it “justice in America,” and predicted more indictments to come, though he denied having a “list.” (Politico)
- Democrats, civil liberties advocates, and legal experts condemned the move as a politically motivated abuse of power. (The Guardian)
- Comey proclaimed his innocence, expressed faith in the judiciary, and warned of the personal cost of challenging Trump. (Just Security)
- The DOJ under AG Pam Bondi has created a Weaponization Working Group to review alleged “prosecutorial abuse.” Critics say it’s already a vehicle for selective targeting. (Wikipedia)
- The Trump administration is also reportedly eyeing liberal nonprofits tied to George Soros and may pursue other high-profile prosecutions. (AP News)
Analysis & Stakes
1. Political Retribution or Legal Accountability?
This indictment is a symbolic victory for Trump against a longtime adversary. But replacing prosecutors to secure charges undermines the independence of the DOJ and raises red flags about political weaponization. (The Guardian)
2. Weaknesses in the Case
The grand jury’s refusal to approve one charge suggests shaky evidence. Plus, the statute of limitations for false-statement charges nearly expired (five years from 2020 testimony). (People)
3. Blowback Ahead
Expect fierce challenges from Democrats, civil rights groups, and institutional watchdogs. There’s growing fear that DOJ career staff will be pressured into partisan prosecutions. (The Guardian)
Conclusion
This isn’t just about Comey—it’s about the rule of law itself. Trump is making good on his promise of retribution, but at what cost? If unchecked, the DOJ risks losing credibility as an independent institution.
👉 Just Facts, No Bullshit: The Comey case is less about justice and more about power. Whether the courts—and the American people—push back will define the next chapter.
🔗 Related Coverage: